13.15 Building the Qal Perfect Strong Paradigm
Understanding how we build the paradigm will prepare you to identify verbs in the Bible
- It will also prepare you to spot when deviations occur in weak verbs
- Study the graphic and the steps below carefully
- It may be confusing at first, but over time, it will begin to make sense
- Add the perfect sufformatives (unless 3MS)
- Put a Sheva before the sufformative
- 3fs/3cp - the Sheva can’t go under \(R_3\) because \(R_3\) already has a vowel
- A consonant can’t have more than one vowel
- For these forms, the Sheva goes under \(R_2\)
- 3fs/3cp - the Sheva can’t go under \(R_3\) because \(R_3\) already has a vowel
- Add Dagesh Lene to תּ that comes after any Sheva (as we would need to do for any בגד כפת letter)
- all 2nd person forms and 1cs
- \(V_S = A\) (Patach) in the Qal Perfect Strong paradigm
- UNLESS \(V_2\) is already a Sheva from step two
- Accent \(V_S\)
- Exception 1 - \(V_2\) is reduced/Sheva
- Exception 2 - there is a “heavy sufformative” that draws the accent (2MP/2FP)
- \(V_1 = \bar A\) (Qamets)
- 2mp/2fp - the Qamets is then reduced to a Vocal Sheva because of propretonic reduction
- OPTIONAL - Add a Metheg mark to \(V_1\) 3fs/3cp